Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Booker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 21, 1954No. 3836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. LatimeR, Judge:

The convening authority and a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General of the Army have affirmed and approved the action of a general court-martial in finding the accused guilty of wrongfully using morphine in violation of Article 134; Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 728. Only a skeletonized version of the facts is stated as the issue involves compulsory self incrimination. At the trial it was established that a corporal of the military police conducted a search of the accused’s person, subsequent to his apprehension…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. Ridgell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. FittenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. McClungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. FittenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API