Legal Opinion

United States v. Fitten

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 26, 1993No. NMCM 92 0815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Senior Judge:

The appellant, in his first assignment of error, challenges the propriety of using evidence obtained by his forced catheterization at U.S.' Naval Hospital, Sari Diego.1 The urine extracted from the appellant provided evidence of his use of cocaine and marijuana.2 *661Appellant’s conviction was based on his plea of guilty to unauthorized absence and his conditional plea of guilty to the wrongful use of cocaine and marijuana. His conditional plea was entered after the judge denied his motion to suppress the results of tests performed on the urine obtained by catheterization. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FittenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. StevensonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. OuthierNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API