Legal Opinion

Thrower v. Harris Beauty Supply Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1971No. 5736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER. CURIAM:

This appeal is from the dismissal of appellant’s complaint with prejudice at the close of her case.1 We affirm.

The statement of proceedings and evidence filed by the trial judge recites that on September 21, 1965, appellant deposited with appellee the sum of $1,000 for the purchase of beauty salon equipment, and that appellee then ordered from others the equipment contracted for. Appellant testified that sometime thereafter she instructed her attorney to cancel the contract. She also produced a letter from her attorney, dated July 22, 1966, which stated that he had collected $417…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. MiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Murchison v. Peoples Contractors, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Reese v. CrosbyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Franklin Investment Co. v. BoydDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API