Legal Opinion

Franklin Investment Co. v. Boyd

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1964No. 3461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from an order vacating a default judgment upon which attachment had issued.

The action was brought by appellant to recover the balance of a promissory note allegedly in arrears. On October 16, 1963, appellant obtained a default judgment, and thereafter a writ of attachment issued. On January 14, 1964, appellee moved to vacate the default and to quash the attachment. Appellee’s motion was heard and granted on January 29, 1964, with leave to file an answer by February 6, 1964. Appellee’s answer was timely filed and on February 7, appellant noted an appeal.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lombard v. WelchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Watwood v. HallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Thrower v. Harris Beauty Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API