Legal Opinion

D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Milton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1969No. 4469PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FICKLING, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict awarding appellee damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.

Appellant complains that, over its objection, appellee was allowed to introduce medical testimony concerning the existence of a permanent knee injury (damaged cartilage) which was not mentioned in ap-pellee’s pre-trial statement. There was no pre-trial order since counsel for both sides waived a pre-trial hearing and exchanged pre-trial statements and medical reports.

The statement of proceedings and evidence does not show that appellant objected to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moncure v. CurryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. James v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. AP Woodson Company v. SakranDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Taylor v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Pinkston v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Moorehead v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Cooper v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. District of Columbia v. PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API