Legal Opinion
Ceco Corp. v. Coleman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1982No. 80-483PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Associate Judge,
Retired:
On April 17, 1975, appellee Norman Coleman (Coleman), then a construction worker, was injured while working on the erection of the East Wing of the National Gallery of Art. As a consequence of his job-related injury, Coleman was paid workers’ compensation benefits by his employer, the Charles H. Tompkins Company (Tompkins), the general contractor for the East Wing construction project. Coleman later brought suit against appellant, Ceco Corporation (Ceco), a subcontractor on the East Wing job, alleging that it and its employees had negligently caused or…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Joy v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Moss v. StockardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.