Legal Opinion

Neifert v. Hasley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1907No. Docket No. 7PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Albert Neifert against Philip P. Hasley, a surgeon, for malpractice. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff, a man 30 years old, was badly injured in May, 1903, by machinery. According to his testimony, his right arm was broken in three places between the shoulder and elbow, some ribs were broken, his leg was broken just below the knee, he was badly hurt about the head, and a portion of his skull was gone. Defendant, a physician and surgeon, attended him until some time in the summer, and, as plaintiff claims, was negligent and unskillful in his treatment. The declaration alleges, as improper treatment, permitting and causing the broken brones not to be placed in apposition the one to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Pelky v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Schumacher v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API