In Re Doctor's Hosp. of Laredo, Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
This original proceeding involves the interpretation of Rule 192.3 of the new discovery rules. The trial court construed the rule to permit the deposition of a consulting witness and to permit the production of a testifying witness’s income tax schedules and appointment calendars. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
Background
The real parties in interest and plaintiffs below, Enedelia and Humberto Martinez, sued the relator, Doctors’ Hospital of Laredo, for medical malpractice arising from the birth of Lynette Martinez. The plaintiffs noticed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Maresca v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Pony Express Courier Corp. v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Tom L. Scott, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In Re Sullivan, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- In re WhartonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- In Re Makris, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.