Legal Opinion

Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates v. Public Utility Commission of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1990No. C-9287PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOGGETT, Justice.

In this appeal certain consumers of a public utility urge that it be denied a second opportunity to prove the same facts as justification for an electric rate increase. We agree that the public utility regulatory scheme set forth by the legislature provides that once is enough. The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel bar such relitigation before the Public Utility Commission (“PUC”).

Gulf States Utilities Company (“GSU”) sought a rate increase which required the PUC to determine whether the $4.5 billion that GSU spent for completion of the River Bend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Suburban Utility Corp. v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sexton v. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Westheimer Independent School District v. BrocketteTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kansas University Endowment Ass'n v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API