Legal Opinion

Elcox v. Hill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1878No. 84PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

98 U.S. 218

25 L.Ed. 103

ELCOX

v.

HILL.

October Term, 1878

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

This is an action of trespass on the case by Elcox and Larter against Hill, proprietor of a public hotel in the city of Chicago, to recover the value of a quantity of jewelry lost by them while Larter was a guest at the hotel.

The plaintiffs were manufacturing jewellers, doing business at Newark, N. J. Larter left home for a tour through several Western cities, with some $6,300 worth of jewelry, which was contained in two travelling-bags or satchels, like…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hunt.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Purvis v. . Coleman StetsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Stewart v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Elcox v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pfennig v. Roosevelt HotelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Shiman Bros. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Beale v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Gorzeman v. ArtzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Matson Navigation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API