Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Matson Navigation Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1960No. 4073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

CASSIDY, J.

From the allegations of tbe complaint and the record in this case it appears that while Walter and Ida B. Erman were guests at defendant’s (appellant’s) Royal Hawaiian Hotel they entrusted a mink coat to an employee of tbe hotel to be taken from and protected out of their room and the employee so negligently cared for the coat that it was lost or stolen while in his custody. Plaintiff (appellee), as insurer, paid the owners $2,000 for the loss and, in subrogation, by this action seeks to recover the amount from the defendant hotel owner.

A special defense set…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Shiman Bros. & Co. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Shifflette v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Gabriel v. MargahHawaii Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Kamanus. v. E.E. Black, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hanover Insurance Co. v. Alamo MotelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Albuquerque Hilton Inn v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Terry v. Lincscott Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Link-Simon, Inc. v. Muehlebach Hotel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API