Legal Opinion

Joerger v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4552PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— This is an application for a writ of supersedeas to stay the alleged threatened enforcement of a preliminary injunction pending an appeal from the injunctive order.

The parcels of land designated on the accompanying diagram as Á, B, C, D and E are riparian to Hat Creek, a natural stream in Shasta County. The course of the stream is shown by the meandering parallel lines. The plaintiff Joerger is and has been since July 7, 1920, the owner, including the riparian right incident thereto, of the forty acres designated as parcel D. He is also the owner of parcels B and C except the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Feinberg v. One Doe Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Byington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API