Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing, a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
In its course through Los Angeles County the Santa Ana River forms the dividing line between the ranchos Canon de Santa Ana, San Juan y Cajon de Santa Ana, and Las Bolsas on the one side, and the ranchos Santiago de Santa Ana and Lomas de Santiago on the other. Between the ranchos Canon de Santa Ana and the San Juan y Cajon de Santa Ana and also fronting on the river is a small piece of land belonging to the government. Erom a map furnished us by the respective parties it appears that the rancho Santiago de Santa Ana has a frontage on the river almost equal to the combined frontage of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.