Legal Opinion

Roeder v. Huish

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1970No. 9902-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

John and Audrey Roeder, husband and wife and plaintiffs below, contracted with the Huish Construction Company, defendant, to have the latter construct a home for them. The contract was signed by both parties in May of 1966. A dispute arose concerning the performance of the contract, after which plaintiffs brought a cause of action against defendant, alleging breach of contract.

The contract contained a standard arbitration clause, which reads partially as follows:

“Any disagreement arising out of this contract or from the breach thereof shall be submitted to arbitration, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School District No. 46 v. Del BiancoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Son Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Roberto Construction Co. v. Burnham-Manning Post 1105 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Town of Danvers v. Wexler Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Dusold v. Porta-John Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Maine Central Railroad v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API