Legal Opinion
Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Son Construction Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1970No. 9674PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
The appellant, Bolo Corporation, has appealed an order of the Superior Court granting the plaintiff-appellee’s motion to compel arbitration. The argument raised in opposition is that the plaintiff, by its actions had waived its right to compel arbitration and must therefore proceed with the civil action originally brought. We agree with the position taken by the appellant for the reasons stated below.
The parties entered into a written contract, executed on the 27th day of December, 1963, wherein the appellee, Homes and Son Construction Co., Inc., agreed to construct for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Local 659, I.A.T.S.E. v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Drake v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ojus Industries, Inc. v. MannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Homes & Son Construction Co., Inc. v. Bolo Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.