Hamilton v. Hamilton

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff first assigns error to the trial court’s finding that the reasonable needs of the parties’ minor child are only $950 per month when plaintiffs sworn affidavit showed them to be $1,275 per month. While we cannot determine from the court’s findings exactly how it arrived at the $950 figure, we find no abuse of discretion. The plaintiffs affidavit included a number of expenditures which the court could have found to be unnecessary to the welfare of the child. We hold, therefore, that there was competent evidence to support the court’s finding of fact as to the reasonable…