Legal Opinion

Bali Co. v. City of Kings Mountain

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1999No. COA98-388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Petitioners appeal the trial court’s essentially identical judgments “denying the [ir] petition seeking review of annexation and affirming the Annexation Ordinance” (the Ordinance) adopted by the Governing Board of respondent City of Kings Mountain (the City). According to petitioners, the trial court erred in that: 1) annexation Area 97-A (Area 97-A) was not “developed for urban purposes” as defined in N.C.G.S. § 160A-48(c) (1994), 2) the City failed to use topographic features in fixing interior boundaries of annexation Area 97-B (Area 97-B), and 3) the City’s Annexation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. In Re Annexation Ordinance No. 300-XSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Bustle v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norwood v. VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Nolan v. Village of MarvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API