Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nolan v. Village of Marvin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 2005No. COA04-1169Published

1Dissent

Tyson, Judge dissenting.

The majority's opinion holds respondent's annexation ordinance satisfies the statutory and case law requirements and affirms the trial court's order. I respectfully dissent.

I. Legislative Intent

Our Supreme Court stated in Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Asheville:

"The primary rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the legislature controls the interpretation of a statute." Stevenson v. City of Durham, 281 N.C. 300, 303, 188 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1972). The foremost task in statutory interpretation is " `to determine legislative intent while giving the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Turlington v. McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Spruill v. Lake Phelps Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API