Nolan v. Village of Marvin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Tyson, Judge dissenting.
The majority's opinion holds respondent's annexation ordinance satisfies the statutory and case law requirements and affirms the trial court's order. I respectfully dissent.
I. Legislative Intent
Our Supreme Court stated in Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Asheville:
"The primary rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the legislature controls the interpretation of a statute." Stevenson v. City of Durham, 281 N.C. 300, 303, 188 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1972). The foremost task in statutory interpretation is " `to determine legislative intent while giving the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Turlington v. McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Spruill v. Lake Phelps Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.