Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Annexation Ordinance No. 300-X

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 18PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Petitioners first argue that the City’s annexation plan fails to meet the requirements of G.S. 160A-47(3) in that it lacks sufficient detail and specificity.

G.S. 160A-47(3) requires a municipality’s annexation report to contain:(3) A statement setting forth the plans of the municipality for extending to the area to be annexed each major municipal service performed within the municipality at the time of annexation. Specifically, such plans shall:

a. Provide for extending police protection, fire protection, garbage collection and street maintenance services to the area to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Styers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Huyck Corp. v. Town of Wake ForestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
  3. Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Matter of City of Durham Annexation Ord. No. 5791Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Perry v. Pamlico CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API