Bustle v. Rice
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment, entered after a non-jury trial, denying their claim for damages for alleged breach of a contract to purchase real property and for tortious “misappropriation” of certain monies. Plaintiffs assignments of error appear in the record as follows:
ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
That the Court entered the Order based on total misinterpretation of the contract between the parties and the prevailing laws of the State of North Carolina for the following reasons:
1. That the Court totally ignored monies received by the defendants which have not been accounted for to the plaintiff.
2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Seay v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. ReplogleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Shook v. County of BuncombeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Adams v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.