Legal Opinion

Security Bank & Trust Co. of Ponca City v. Fabricating, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1983Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

BROCK, Justice.

I

The appellants (bondholder class) have filed a petition to rehear in this cause *866which we have considered and find to be without merit. Accordingly, the petition to rehear filed by the bondholder class is denied.

II

The appellees, the Sklar firm, have requested, pursuant to Rule 40(d), T.R.A.P., that the Court authorize as an item of additional recoverable costs on appeal the premiums incurred by them for procuring and maintaining, while this case was in the appellate courts, premiums for a bond for stay of the judgment or decree rendered in the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giemza v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Johnston v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Christenson v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Hackenjos v. Kemper Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API