Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Alfred A. Krieter, and Lufthansa German Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1977No. 77-1251PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
BACKGROUND
Krieter was employed by Lufthansa, a common carrier, under a contract of employment of persons engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. The parties were subject to the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. § 151, et seq. (1970)].
Lufthansa discharged Krieter who claimed the discharge was not “for cause” and, therefore, impermissible under the contract between the airline and the union. Lufthansa and Krieter proceeded through preliminary grievance procedures provided in the contract. Krieter then requested that the dispute be submitted to arbitration pursuant to Article XV of the collective…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- William v. Ficek v. Southern Pacific Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Richard E. Sullivan v. Pacific and Arctic Railway and Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Air Line Pilots Association International v. Aviation Associates Inc., D/B/A Sunaire ExpressCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Krakowski v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (In re Amr Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Gibbons v. United Transportation UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.