Legal Opinion
Richard E. Sullivan v. Pacific and Arctic Railway and Navigation Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1971No. 24680_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
Sullivan brought a common law action for wrongful discharge in the district court against his former employer, Pacific and Arctic Railway and Navigation Company [the Company], accepting the discharge as final and asking for money damages. His appeal from the summary judgment, 1 entered by the District Court, in favor of the Company raises the issue of whether it was necessary for him, under federal or state law, to exhaust his remedies under a collective bargaining agreement before bringing suit. We conclude that exhaustion of administrative remedies was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Etc., (Plaintiffs) v. Mesker Bros. Industries, Inc., (Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Hazel O. Haney v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Transue v. Aesthetech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Alfred A. Krieter, and Lufthansa German Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- McGann v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.