Legal Opinion

Tuft v. Federal Leasing

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1982No. 17392PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendants Federal Leasing and Bay-shore Inn appeal the trial court’s judgment quieting title in plaintiff J. Reed Tuft to a parcel of real property.

On March 27, 1964, defendants Wendell and Irene Butcher mortgaged a parcel of land to plaintiffs predecessor in title, Stre-vell-Paterson Finance Corporation (Stre-vell), to secure a promissory note. This note became delinquent on March 31, 1966. On November 2 of that year, the Butchers conveyed the parcel to Carnicero Dynasty Corporation (Carnicero) by warranty deed. Carnicero did not assume or agree to pay the Butchers’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hansen v. KohlerUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hadlock v. Benjamin Drainage Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bagnall v. Suburbia Land Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Timm v. DewsnupUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. A.C. Financial, Inc. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. 4447 Associates v. First Security FinancialCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. Blodgett v. Zions First National BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API