Legal Opinion

4447 Associates v. First Security Financial

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 6, 1995No. 930293-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Presiding Judge:

Plaintiff 4447 Associates appeals the trial court’s judgment that defendant First Security Financial, as an account debtor, is not responsible to 4447 Associates under an assignment of the account for security. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

In December 1982, First Security Financial and Capitol Thrift and Loan entered into an asset purchase agreement, whereby First Security purchased substantially all of Capitol’s assets for $1,379,911. Under the agreement, First Security paid $200,000 to Capitol at closing, with interest payments due…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Matter of Estate of BartellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bayer Corp. v. MascoTech, Inc. (In re Autostyle Plastics, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Badger v. Brooklyn Canal CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Davidson Lumber Sales, Inc., Debtor. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. Christiansen Brothers, Inc., and Jacobsen-Robbins ConstructionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. People v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Eskelsen v. Theta Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API