Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Kandiyohi County Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1925No. 24,429PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Plaintiff is the wife of Fred W. Tomlinson, who holds title in fee to the premises in question, which he and his wife, with their children, have occupied as their homestead for about 20 years. This action was brought by the wife to have a mortgage canceled and discharged of record, which she signed but claims was never delivered. The complaint is dated August 29, 1922, and the cause was tried in November, 1923. Findings were made and judgment ordered in favor of the plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for amended findings or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Fred W. Tomlinson had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Dye v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McPhee v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Lesch v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Ryan v. ColburnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Bengtson v. SetterbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. JewisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Meidinger v. Security State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API