Legal Opinion

White v. Bateman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1961No. 7219PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice.

The basic question presented in this appeal is whether the provisions of A.R.S. Title 16, chapter 6, which is entitled “Nomination Other Than By Primary Election,” apply to a person who has run in the preceding primary election and has been defeated therein.

The facts as stipulated to by the parties may be briefly stated as follows: Laurence White (hereinafter referred to as “appellant”) and Coy DeArman (hereinafter called “intervenor”) were both candidates for sheriff of Pinal County in the Democratic Primary held on September 13, 1960. The appellant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austad v. AustadUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. La Prade v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. O'Neil v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cavender v. Board of Supervisors of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API