Provenzano v. Shidler

*234OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The question involved in this appeal is whether the trial court committed error in sustaining defendants5 motion to preclude evidence. The order complained of was made under the provisions of sec. 8624, N.C.L.1929, which reads as follows: “It shall not be necessary for a party to set forth in a pleading the items of an account therein alleged, but he shall deliver to the adverse party within five days after a demand thereof, in writing, a copy of the account, or be precluded from giving evidence thereof. The court, or a judge thereof, may order a further…