Harrison v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. On March 31, 2009, the Court issued an Order granting defendant’s motion in part and denying it in part without prejudice. This Opinion explains the reasoning behind that Order.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff William Henry Harrison was in prison serving a federal sentence when he filed this pro se complaint against the defendant, the Federal Bureau of Prisons…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bigwood v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Pinson v. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Harrison v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical ExaminerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.