Legal Opinion
Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 13, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0199 (RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff brings suit against the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner (“OAFME”), the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (“AFIP”) and the Department of Defense (“DOD”) alleging violations of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. For the reasons discussed below, the court…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical ExaminerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical ExaminerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pulliam v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- American Oversight v. U.S. General Services AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.