People v. Bennett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, P. J.
Defendant was found guilty of robbery in the first degree. He now appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. It is the conclusion of this court that none of his contentions are meritorious.
The victim of the robbery, Jesse H. Mitchell, and his companion, Donald H. Carnegie, became acquainted with defendant at the bar of a gambling casino at Lake Tahoe. At their suggestion, defendant joined them for dinner, during which it was agreed that he would also join them on an excursion to Squaw Valley the following day. It was also suggested that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. DozieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.