Legal Opinion

People v. Navarro

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1963No. Crim. 52PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellant was charged by an information with the crime of violation of section 211 of the Penal Code, a felony, in that he and codefendant Vargas did wilfully and unlawfully rob a drugstore proprietor of narcotics and money. At the time of the offense, Vargas was armed with a .32 caliber automatic pistol and appellant was standing outside the store.

Appellant was represented by counsel throughout the jury trial and the jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree. A motion for new trial was denied; probation was denied; and the appellant was sentenced to state prison. His counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LessardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. EllhamerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. LuzovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In RE SHEPPARD v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. ShonHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API