Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McKnight

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1933PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The first of these cases is an indictment under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 266, § 53A, which originated in St. 1922, c. 313, § 2. The text of the statute appears in Commonwealth v. Nichols, 257 Mass. 289. The indictment charged in three counts that the defendant, with others, being officers of the Medford Trust Company, “did loan funds of said corporation and knowingly receive or accept for said corporation ... a fictitious, valueless, inadequate or irresponsible obligation as security for said loan, the consideration or security not being otherwise sufficient, and not being necessary to prevent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. HorsfallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Commonwealth v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Dolan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Murray v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API