Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McDonald

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 17, 1928PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The defendants were tried upon an indictment which charged them with assault with intent to rob. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of simple assault as to each defendant. A bill of exceptions in ordinary form was allowed and has been prosecuted by the defendants. They also claimed an appeal founded upon exceptions, and seasonably filed assignments of errors alleged to have been committed by the trial judge during the trial; and this appeal with full transcript of the evidence and charge and exceptions saved during the same trial has also been prosecuted and the papers are before us. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. MadeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Whitney v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Plummer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UnderwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. StokesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API