Legal Opinion

Murray v. Continental Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 20, 1943PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The defendant issued to the plaintiff, a dealer in wool remnants maintaining an office and warehouse in Canton, a policy insuring his stock in trade against loss from sprinkler leakage. There was evidence that a portion of the roof of the plaintiff’s warehouse was blown off by a hurricane and windstorm which visited Canton in the late afternoon of September 21, 1938, and that, as a result, the automatic sprinkler system was broken and the plaintiff’s stock was damaged by the escaping water. On the other hand, there was testimony that the break in the system had occurred an hour before the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Freeman v. Travelers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Coburn v. Travelers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Boazova v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API