Legal Opinion

Poland v. Ott

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 22, 2009No. 01-07-00199-CVPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellants, Raymon Poland, individually and as independent administrator of the estate of Jessie Poland, Robert Martin, and Frank Martin (“the Poland parties”), timely moved for rehearing to the panel and for en bane reconsideration to the Court. On March 5, 2008, the Court denied the Poland parties’ rehearing motion, but their motion for en banc reconsideration remained pending, thus maintaining our plenary power over the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 19.1; see also City of San Antonio v. Hartman, 201 S.W.3d 667, 670-71 (Tex.2006) (in holding that motion for en banc…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. HartmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kendrick v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  3. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Schepps v. Presbyterian Hospital of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Carroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. In re CVR Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Offenbach v. Stockton Ex Rel. Stockton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Goforth v. Bradshaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. David Leroy Taflinger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API