Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Hartman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. 05-0147PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

This interlocutory appeal presents two jurisdictional questions. First, we have jurisdiction of the appeal only if a motion for rehearing en banc qualifies as a “motion for rehearing” that extends the deadline for a petition for review. Second, the trial court has no jurisdiction of the case if a 100-year flood is an “emergency situation” to which government immunity applies. Answering both questions in the affirmative, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment dismissing the case.

I

On October 17, 1998, the City of San Antonio was visited by a rainstorm of historic…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Dallas Cty. Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. BossleyTexas Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Leggett, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  2. Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. FRIENDSWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Pakdimounivong v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. City of Pasadena v. Kuhn, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Poland v. Ott, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API