City of San Antonio v. Hartman
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister
This interlocutory appeal presents two jurisdictional questions. First, we have jurisdiction of the appeal only if a motion for rehearing en banc qualifies as a “motion for rehearing” that extends the deadline for a petition for review. Second, the trial court has no jurisdiction of the case if a 100-year flood is an “emergency situation” to which government immunity applies. Answering both questions in the affirmative, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment dismissing the case.
I
On October 17, 1998, the City of San Antonio was visited by a rainstorm of historic…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Wichita Falls State Hospital v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Dallas Cty. Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. BossleyTexas Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- City of Austin v. Leggett, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. FRIENDSWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Pakdimounivong v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- City of Pasadena v. Kuhn, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Poland v. Ott, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.