Legal Opinion

Klinginsmith v. Allen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1952No. 33155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff brought this action at law to recover damages for criminal conversation without pleading any issue of alienation of his wife’s affections as an element of damages. Concededly they were not alienated. The defense was a general denial.

The issues were submitted to a jury, whereupon it returned a verdict for defendant and judgment was rendered thereon' in his favor. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled and he appealed, assigning substantially that: (1) The verdict and judgment were not sustained by sufficient evidence but were contrary thereto and contrary to law; (2) the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koehn v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lewis v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hurlbut v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Oliver v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Redman Industries, Inc. v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Adkins v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API