Hurlbut v. Hall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Morris, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff in error upon a promissory note, a copy of which is set out in the petition as follows:
“$120. Harvard, Neb., August 31, 1888.
“On or before the 31st day of August, 1889, I promise to pay to the order of W. T. Magee one hundred and twenty dollars, value received, with interest at 10 per cent per annum. A. W. Hall.
“Payable at Clay County Fence Factory.”
The note was indorsed as follows: “ Pay without recourse. 'W. T. Magee.” ■
*891The petition-alleges the making and delivering of the note by the defendant to the payee therein named; that plaintiff is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Converse v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Republican Valley Railroad v. ArnoldNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Labaree v. KlostermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- State Savings Bank v. ShafferNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- O'Hara v. WellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. FavishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Brooks v. Thayer CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Erickson v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Lydick v. GillNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Imhoff v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.