Hibernia Savings and Loan Soc. v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action on an alleged judgment for deficiency after foreclosure sale of mortgaged premises. A verdict in favor of plaintiff for the amount of such alleged judgment, with interest, was rendered by the jury trying the ease, in- accord with an instruction of the trial court directing them to so do. This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment entered on such verdict, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Upon the facts, as established by the admissions of the answer and the uncontroverted evidence given at the trial, the trial court was fully warranted in instructing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashton v. HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ames v. HoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- In re Will of WarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Weller v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Heyman v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Trs. of William Randolph Hearst Testamentary Tr. v. LubinskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Craemer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- O'Brien v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Seaboard National Bank v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Mosley v. MosleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.