Legal Opinion

Loudy v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1946No. 31927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is an action at law to recover for damages to plaintiff’s automobile in a collision between it and a train owned and operated by defendant. Upon trial to a jury plaintiff was awarded a verdict and judgment. Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and it appealed to this court. There are numerous assignments of error but since our decision must be that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to dismiss or direct a verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence it will not be necessary to discuss the other assignments.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged substantially that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Steenbock v. Omaha Country ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Eggeling v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bunton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Anderson v. ByrdNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hegarty v. Campbell Soup Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Maricle v. SpiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Roby v. AukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McIntosh v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Milk House Cheese Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API