Legal Opinion

Roby v. Auker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1948No. 32294PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is an action to recover for damages resulting from an automobile collision. Plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict and .judgment thereon. Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and he appealed to this court, assigning that the trial court erred: (1) In refusing to sustain defendant’s motion for directed verdict; (2) in sustaining plaintiff’s motion to withdraw from the jury defendant’s counterclaim pleaded in his cross-petition; (3) in giving instructions Nos. 5 and 12 respectively; and (4) that the verdict and judgment thereon were not sustained by the evidence but were contrary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bainter v. AppelNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Belik v. WarsockiNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. McClelland v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Meyer v. Platte Valley Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Davis v. DennertNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Coyle v. StopakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Maricle v. SpiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Stark v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API