McIntosh v. Union Pacific Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
This is an action at law to recover damages to plaintiffs automobile, and for personal injuries sustained by her in a collision between such automobile and a train owned and operated by defendant.
The plaintiffs petition, for the purpose of determining this appeal, alleged substantially that the collision and damages proximately resulted from the negligence of the defendant, caused by: (1) Placing and maintaining on yard tracks, composing a part of the crossing, box cars and coal cars obstructing the view of this plaintiff and other motorists from seeing trains coming from the west, and by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eggeling v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Roberts v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Askey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Parks v. MetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Bannister v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Corbitt v. Omaha Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Thomas v. OwensNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Carley v. MeinkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Milk House Cheese Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Ecker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.