Legal Opinion

State v. S.J.W.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2010No. 83177-7PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 This case asks us to determine which party under RCW 5.60.050 bears the burden to establish a 14-year-old child’s competency and whether a trial court should presume a child is competent to testify as a witness. S.J.W. was charged with the third degree rape of 14-year-old W.M., a developmentally delayed boy. The State offered W.M. as a witness to testify against S.J.W., and S.J.W. challenged W.M.’s competency to testify. At the competency hearing, the trial judge concluded S.J.W. failed to meet his burden to establish that W.M. was not competent to testify. The trial judge permitted W.M.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. C.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jenkins v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. DOT FOODS v. Washington Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ColeyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BrousseauWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BrousseauWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rodolfo Apostol v. Ronald Wastewater DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. J.w., Dob: 7/22/97Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API