Legal Opinion
World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 26, 2008No. CV 07-238 ABC (JWJx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs World Wide Rush, LLC and Insite Outdoor Works LA, LLC’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on July 24, 2008. Defendant City of Los Angeles (the “City”) opposed on August 4, 2008 and Plaintiffs replied on August 11, 2008. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the August 18, 2008 hearing date. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the papers and case file in this matter, the Court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- World Wide Rush LLC v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009