Legal Opinion
World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2010No. 08-56454, 08-56523, 09-55494, 09-55792, 09-55791PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
The City of Los Angeles (“City”) appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of World Wide Rush and Insite Out door Works LA (collectively “WWR”) and the entry of injunctions in favor of WWR and Wilshire Center, Jamison, and Sky Tag (collectively “Sky Tag”) enjoining enforcement of certain billboard regulations. We must decide whether the district court erred in concluding that (1) the City’s Freeway Facing Sign Ban is an unconstitutionally underinclusive restriction on commercial speech and (2) the City’s Supergraphic and Off-Site Sign Bans are unconstitutional…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hunt v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.