Legal Opinion
World Wide Rush LLC v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 18, 2009No. CV 07-00238 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-04762 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-05434 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-07584 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-05066 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-08508 ABC (JWJx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: BILLBOARDS
AUDREY B. COLLINS, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it numerous related cases concerning billboards and their modern equivalents, “Supergraphic Signs.” These “Billboard Cases” all concern challenges to the City of Los Angeles’s laws regulating the use and construction of Supergraphic Signs, enormously large advertisements, usually on a type of vinyl, that are stretched or pasted across the side of a building. They are hard to miss. Super- graphics often span the width of a building and cover over ten floors. These signs are almost always “Off-Site” signs,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People v. Vanguard Outdoor CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014