Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Syrian Arab Republic

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2005No. Civil Action 01-1628 (RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Denying Syria’s Motion to Dismiss

I. INTRODUCTION

This case involves the Syrian Arab Republic’s alleged support of a terrorist group (the Kurdistan Workers Party or “PKK”) that abducted and held certain of the plaintiffs hostage in the early 1990s. The plaintiffs seek damages from the Syrian Arab Republic (“Syria”) and the PKK for injuries resulting from the alleged hostage taking. Syria now moves to dismiss the plaintiffs’ third amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, the court denies Syria’s motion to dismiss.

II.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holland v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Rux v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. Vine v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Zander v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API