Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. De Lancey Stables Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1908No. 2,834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trial by the Court Without a Jury.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The petition in this case avers that the De Lancey Stables Company is a corporation “principally engaged in the livery stable business, buying and selling horses and feed”; this averment being evidently intended to bring the corporation within the provisions of section 4, cl. “b,” Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 547 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3423], concerning trading companies or companies engaged in mercantile pursuits. The answer took issue with the petition upon this point, and a trial was afterwards had by agreement before the court without a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. The W. G. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  2. Sweeney v. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  3. In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
  4. In re Surety Guarantee & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  5. Zugalla v. International Mercantile AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cate v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  2. G. Angelo Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  3. G. Angelo Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API