Legal Opinion

Gurtin v. Overland-Knight Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1929No. 27,623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Certiorari by the defendant employer and its insurer to review the order of the industrial commission awarding the plaintiff employe compensation for 100 weeks, upon the ground that he had suffered a 50 per cent disability of his leg through an accidental injury.

The plaintiff sustained an injury to his knee. At the time of the trial there ivas little flexion. The three physicians who testified gave their opinion that in a few months, perhaps two or three, there would be complete ankylosis. Considering the nature of the injury a condition of complete ankylosis was desirable. The employe would…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State ex rel. Globe Indemnity Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Wexel v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Kruchowski v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Unger v. Balkan Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API